Most business content tells you what happened. Very little tells you why it matters, what pattern it fits, and what to do next. The Insight Standard exists to close that gap.
Every article on Industry Insight is written for one reader: a senior professional who makes consequential decisions and has no time for content that does not respect their intelligence or their time.
The six criteria below are not aspirational. They are the minimum requirement for publication. If an article does not meet all six, it does not get published.
The Six Criteria
Every claim must be sourced from a verifiable, credible source — governments, regulators, central banks, IMF, World Bank, OECD, WEF, IEA, McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, PwC, EY, KPMG, Reuters, Bloomberg, FT, WSJ, company filings, investor reports, or recognised industry bodies.
If something cannot be verified, we state: "I cannot confirm this." We do not present assumptions as facts. We do not use outdated information as if it is current.
Every article must explain what is happening, why it matters, what is changing, who is affected, what risks and opportunities are emerging, and what business leaders should do next. Information without interpretation is not insight.
We do not recap the news. We do not summarise what is already widely known. We find the pattern underneath the data and explain why it changes how you should think.
Every piece carries a global lens. We cover the US, UK, Europe, China, India, the Middle East, emerging markets, global supply chains, and multinational companies where relevant. We do not write exclusively for one market or one geography.
Industry Insight is published from the UK and written for the world.
Every article ends with Strategic Takeaways — specific, evidenced, and immediately actionable for senior professionals. These are not generic suggestions. They are the specific actions a leader in the relevant sector or role should be taking in response to what the article has established.
An article that does not end with clear, specific takeaways has not finished its job.
Every article is written for decision-makers who lead teams, own P&Ls, and operate at board or senior leadership level. The language is clear, the structure is tight, and every sentence must earn its place. No jargon for its own sake. No hedging. No padding.
The first sentence earns the second — or it gets cut.
Every article must contain an angle that you cannot get from a news source, a press release, or a generic business publication. The non-obvious angle is what separates intelligence from information — the pattern underneath the data that changes how you think, not just what you know.
If the insight is obvious, it is not ready to publish.
Source Standards
Industry Insight uses only credible, current sources. The following organisations and publications are our primary reference points.
Institutions
IMF · World Bank · OECD · WEF · IEA · BIS · Federal Reserve · ECB · Bank of England · G20
Consultancies
McKinsey · BCG · Bain · Deloitte · PwC · EY · KPMG · Gartner · Forrester · S&P Global
Media
Financial Times · Wall Street Journal · Bloomberg · Reuters · The Economist · Harvard Business Review
Primary Sources
Company filings · Investor reports · Government publications · Regulatory announcements · Central bank data
We do not use unverified social media posts, anonymous sources, or publications with known political or commercial bias as primary sources. All source quality is assessed and publication dates are checked. We do not use outdated information as if it is current.
The Intelligence Brief
Subscribe to The Intelligence Brief and receive one deep-dive insight every Tuesday morning — verified, structured, and decision-ready.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.